Fields of Research of Military Anthropology

  • Maria Vivod CNRS UMR 7367 ‘Dynamics of Europe’, Strasbourg, France / Novi Sad, Serbia

Abstrakt

The aim of the paper is to suggest moving away from the dichotomy of ‘Anthropology of’ and ‘Anthropology for’ the military. In order to preserve the scientific character and the original anthropological perspective, the paper analyzes the theoretical impasse in which this sub discipline of Anthropology is pushed in the past decades due to the moralizing stance of research attitudes. In purely a theoretical manner, the paper dissects the main currents of research and ponders how the discipline boiled down on a scholarly debate which turns around ‘for’ v.s ‘of’ while being blissfully unware of illogical trapes it succumbs.

Bibliografia

Bouthoul, G., Le phénomène-guerre, Payot, Paris,1962.

Gusterson, H., Anthropology and Militarism, “Annu. Rev. Anthropol”. 2007

Hickey, G. C., (Window on a war : an anthropologist in the Vietnam conflict. Texas Tech University Press, 2002

Kambiz, K. US Army is Embedding Anthropologists https://Anthropology.net/2007/10/04/us-army-is-embedding-anthropologists/

Kamrani, K. The AAA decides to oppose HTS Anthropology https://Anthropology.net/2007/11/07/the-aaa-decides-to-oppose-hts-Anthropology/

Kamrani, K. Anthropologists in the Military – A First-Hand Account by Jeff Bristol https://Anthropology.net/2007/10/30/anthropologists-in-the-military-a-first-hand-account-by-jeff-bristol/

Kulick, D.,Theory in Furs: Masochist Anthropology “Current Anthropology”, Vol. 47, No. 6, December 2006

Lucas, G. R. The Morality of ‘Military Anthropology’. “Journal of Military Ethics”, Vol. 7, No. 3, 165185, 2008

Lutz, C. Homefront : a military city and the American twentieth century. Boston: Beacon Press, 2002

McFate, M. Anthropology and Counterinsurgency: The Strange Story of their Curious Relationship. “Military review”,March -April 2005

Price, D.H., Military Anthropology: Soldiers, Scholars and Subjects at Margins of Empire by Montgomery McFate (review). “Anthropological Quarterly”, Volume 92, Number 3, Summer 2019

Enloe, C., The recruiter and the sceptic: a critical feminist approach to military studies. “Critical Military Studies”. Volume 1, Issue 1, 2015

Favret-Saada , J., Les Mots, la Mort, les Sorts. La Sorcellerie dans le bocage. Paris : Gallimard , 1977 (Deadly Words: Witchcraft in the Bocage. Cambridge University Press, 1981)

Sluka. J.A. Curiouser and Curiouser: Montgomery McFate’s Strange Interpretation of the Relationship between Anthropology and Counterinsurgency. “PoLAR”, Vol. 33, No. S1.May 2010

Strong, T. Human Terrain and the IRB Puzzle. Savage Minds. https://savageminds.org/2007/10/18/human-terrain-and-the-irb-puzzle/

Roldan, A.A., Vermeulen, H. Fieldwork and Footnotes: Studies in the History of European Anthropology, Routledge, 1995

Mohr, S., Sørensen B.R., Weisdorf, M., The Ethnography of Things Military – Empathy and Critique in Military Anthropology, “Ethnos”,2019

McFate, M., Military Anthropology: Soldiers, Scholars and Subjects at the Margins of Empire. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2018

Webb, M. (Youtube channel: MedAnthVideos) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6XdGgOd09U

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0bgduG6Kx8

Walter, N., The sexual cycles of human warfare, Mitre Press, 1950

Wynn, L., News of anthropologists in the military starts circulating on Muslim website https://culturematters.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/news-of-anthropologists-in-the-military-starts-circulating-on-muslim-websites/

Opublikowane
2021-03-01
Dział
Artykuły recenzowane